Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The Fifth Element

  • Dec. 23rd, 2005 at 11:19 AM
movies, filmmaking
You know what? The Fifth Element just is not good. It would probably be passable if not for one of the most annoying characters in movie history, that obnoxious radio announcer guy. I mean come on. I suppose he is meant to inject a bit of style and glamor into the whole science fiction genre but christ, what a screwup. It's either incredibly pretentious or just bad, take your pick. Speaking of incredibly pretentious or just bad, that scene with the diva is just awful. The music is bad, and the crappy house beat and the diva doing her little rave dance is just embarrassing. I don't want to be a bigot, but it just all seems so eurotrashy.

And while the premise "hot chick turns out to be the secret weapon that will save the universe!" sounds good on paper, the realization is just lame. Yes, Milla Jovovich is pretty and has some good moves, and is occasionally cutely funny in her (character's) efforts to speak English, but she doesn't really have the magnetism to hold your attention in the midst of a weak film. And a special award of shame should go to Gary Oldman, who can be very good, but who rapidly descends into awful when he's just playing a caricature of his other roles. And come on, how stupid a supervillain do you have to be to make a deal with an ever-expanding ball of dark matter that calls you on the phone and makes your forehead bleed? He may promise you wealth, but I'm pretty sure there won't be anywhere to spend it once he consumes the entire fucking universe. Wise up, man. And as long as we're nitpicking, just how big is this universe we're talking about? People seem able to zip from one end of it to the other in a couple of hours at light speed. I have news for you, it takes four years traveling at light speed just to get to the nearest star from here, never mind halfway across the galaxy to fight the expanding ball of dark matter guy.

On the other hand, some of that stuff early on in the New York of the future or whatever is nicely done. Bruce Willis's tiny apartment is comically amusing, ha ha. I know, this movie is supposed to be campy or whatever. Well hallelujah. Try Flash Gordon; now that's campy. This is just Luc Besson smoking too much weed.

Comments

[info]maarten wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 07:42 pm (UTC)
Ooooooo, cranky! I like it.
nonstatic wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 08:56 pm (UTC)
awww...while it's certainly no star wars, i really liked the fifth element just because it was an immersive sci-fi movie which came out at a time when sci-fi was essentially dead to hollywood. i can't really disagree with any of your points...however i thought the look was really good, the effects really well done and milla was so freakin cute! a film that put that much into the look of their world was something i'd missed since star wars...and the fifth element satisfied my craving even if the substance wasn't up to par.

it also remains the #1 DVD to show off your projector according to those crazy hi-fi forums.
[info]optic wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 09:34 pm (UTC)
well if I ever get super home movie setup, I'll be sure to test it out on this movie. if Chris Tucker's obnoxious whining doesn't break all the windows in the house, I will consider the setup a failure.

I do in theory like that the Fifth Element attempted to break the "future = grim and dark" concept in hollywood, except that it turns out that I really prefer my futures grim and dark. or at least people by people who speak monosyllabically at the lower end of the tonal range.

It also gets some points over, say, 12 Monkeys -- whereas 12 Monkeys wants to be deep but turns out to be less complex the closer you look at it (though I still like many things about it), the Fifth Element never claims to be more than it is and therefore at least does not deceive.
nonstatic wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 09:39 pm (UTC)
the ending kept other parts from being more forgivable i think (in that it was incredibly lame). of the fifth element. i speak english.
[info]optic wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 09:41 pm (UTC)
yeah, it wasn't really an awful movie and there was stuff to like. I think a few things (less silly plot, no ruby rhod) could have pushed it over the line to fine for me.
[info]leshii wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 02:41 am (UTC)
wait, what's wrong with 12 monkeys?
[info]dylandigits wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 09:36 pm (UTC)
I think of Fifth Element as "That movie where the universe is populated by ugly men, fashion models, and grumpy aliens pretending to be both."

I like the movie for the little details ("Glass. Water. A cherry!"), and hate it for the larger ones (Ruby Rod, aka the radio host). And that diva, yeah. Crap.

To redeem Besson, check out "Wasabi", which is Besson-produced I think. Jean Reno in Japan as a French cop who... oh, the plot is silly. Just check it out.
[info]optic wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 09:40 pm (UTC)
hmm, Wasabi was on my list when I was in my big Jean Reno phase, until I read like 1000000 negative reviews. The director of Leon doesn't require redeeming in my book though.
[info]ammonoid wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 10:04 pm (UTC)
I liked the 5th Element. Yeah, the plot is really thin, and the hokey love is all you need thing at the end was a little much, but it is a half-decent movie that is still watchable. There are plenty of sci-fi movies that had more going on but are just really crappy in the end. Gattaca had a great concept, plot, and everything but its not a movie I'd watch again. Its all just kind of ..flat.

Gary Oldman was great, if only for his outfit and hairstyle, which has been reproduced point for point in quite a few films.

The only nitpick I have with the movie is that they shut one of the good aliens inside the temple when they leave in the flashback scenes - whatever happens to that guy? They never explain.
[info]hook_and_eyelet wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 10:32 pm (UTC)
Oh, I loooove it when you're sassy.
[info]clobby wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2005 11:19 pm (UTC)
THANK YOU.
[info]mjb wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 12:53 am (UTC)
I thought so too (more or less)
[info]dylandigits wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 06:07 am (UTC)
"fun"
I sure liked it enough to defend it three years ago. Doh. I paid $10 for the VHS of that movie?!?
[info]optic wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 06:28 am (UTC)
apparently, "your a fucking idiot"
[info]leshii wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 02:40 am (UTC)
mull-tee-pasz
mudpie1598 wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 03:39 am (UTC)
hahaha... I loved this saying! Mila was/is too cute! I like her in Resident Evil 1 and 2.

The host sucked, but I'm not partial to Chris Tucker. He's an actor we can all do without.


Seno-apta-gammach "not without my permission"

[info]xmutex wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 05:31 am (UTC)
Dude wrote the movie when he was 13. Cut him slack. Don't you got like some childhood dreams for movies?
[info]optic wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2005 06:29 am (UTC)
don't we all, and thankfully they remain merely dreams. maybe he should make this his next project?
[info]xmutex wrote:
Dec. 25th, 2005 04:55 am (UTC)
Aw I'm pretty sure he's very thankful he got the chance to make his. I sorta like the movie. Makes me feel all kinda full of wonder, like a little kid. Plus Gary Oldman's ridiculous in it.
[info]bitterwhiteguy wrote:
Dec. 25th, 2005 01:20 pm (UTC)
I like the movie precisely because it's ridiculous and it never seems to take itself too seriously(except for about 5-10 minutes at the end). Chris Tucker is annoying at times, but at least the director was willing to let these people be caricatures.

As a side note, I think Chris Tucker should be forced to wear that haircut in 'Rush Hour 12: I have Children to Feed'.